Nair Law LLC
  • Home
  • Biography
    • Rishi Nair >
      • Representative Experience
      • Publications & Awards
      • Professional & Civic Activities
      • Additional Background
  • Nair Law LLC Blog
  • Press Coverage
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer

Trespass and Trespass to Chattels in Evanston Mural Issue

12/5/2012

0 Comments

 
The Chicago Tribune reports on a common issue among neighbors: how one can use land and what actions a neighbor can take on their neighbor's land.  As real property law is foundational, from the Court of Common Pleas in Coke's time to Learned Hand's NY jurisprudence, much of the controversies involving real property have been resolved.
At issue is a mural painted on Green Bay Road near Emerson Street in Evanston, Illinois.  That mural was mistaken for graffiti and painted over without permission of either the owner of the property with the mural or the artists who created it. However alien graffiti is to Coke, is still a straight-forward issue in modern property law.  

Here, a mural painted 10 years ago on the retaining wall for a Metra railway.  Metra gave the artists permission and they used high quality paints that, even after 10 years, were bright and retained excellent contrast.  It was this pop that caught the attention of Metra's neighbor, an unnamed commercial landlord, who signed up a Hertz car rental franchise for his property adjacent to the Metra railway.  Mistaking it for graffiti, the landlord unilaterally painted the wall to obliterate what he considered objectionable graffiti.

The artists contend that there were portions that, perhaps, could be mistaken for graffiti but the entire work clearly depicts scenes and characters from Evanston history and the particular community where the mural was located.

The legal issues boil down to Metra's right to seek damages for trespass onto their land and the diminution in value now that a mural has been painted on their retaining wall.  Trespass to land is proven with one bent blade of grass, but damages in those cases are merely nominal.  Here, Metra has actual damages and the landlord acted flagrantly for his commercial benefit.

In addition to Metra's trespass claim, the artists themselves could sue for trespass to chattels or conversion because their property, a copyrighted work of art, had value that is completely lost due to the intentional acts of the unnamed landlord.

Artists should take steps such as registering their copyrighted works to gain statutory damages and other steps.  Even without a federal registry, common law copyright damages are available.

Nair Law LLC focuses its practice on resolving disputes, either through arbitration or litigation, for both sides.  Nair Law LLC represents both artists and landlords and this case exemplifies how both stand to gain by litigating for their rights.  Nair Law LLC can advise property owners on any property dispute and Nair Law LLC can similarly help artists in any dispute to ensure that their property and rights are protected.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Rishi Nair owns Nair Law LLC and practices as Of Counsel at Keener and Associates, P.C.

    Archives

    October 2013
    September 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012

    Categories

    All
    Accident
    ADA
    Affirmative Defense
    Alienation Of Affection
    Appeal
    Association
    Award
    Bankruptcy
    Breach Of Contract
    Breach Of Warranty
    Cancellation
    Cease And Desist
    Certify
    Choice Of Forum
    Choice Of Law
    Civil Rights
    Civil Rights Act Of 1964
    Class
    Class Action
    Commerce Clause
    Common Carrier
    Common Elements
    Compliance
    Condo
    Condominium
    Constitution
    Constitutional Rights
    Contracts
    Conversion
    Countersue
    Criminal Defense
    Debt
    Debt Collector
    Deep Dish Pizza
    Defamation
    Defense
    Dilution
    Disability
    Discrimination
    Dog Bite
    Driver
    Duty Of Care
    Elements
    Employment
    Employment Litigation
    Expert
    Express Warranty
    Failure To Maintain
    Fall Protection
    FDCPA
    Federal
    Federal Law
    First Amendment
    FOIA
    Forcible Entry And Detainer Act
    Forum Non Conveniens
    Fourteenth Amendment
    Hotel
    Illinois
    Illinois Law
    Implied Warranty
    Infringement
    Injunction
    Insurance
    Intellectual Property
    Intentional Tort
    IP Litigation
    IP Litigation
    Jury
    Jury Verdict
    Lawsuit
    Litigation
    Medical Malpractice
    Negligence
    Negotiate
    Osha
    Personal Injury
    Product Liability
    Property
    Protected Conduct
    Real Estate Landlord Tenant Ordinance
    Real Property
    Reckless
    Retaliation
    RLTO
    Safety
    Second Appellate District
    Section 1983
    Seniority
    Settlement
    Seventh Circuit
    Special
    Speeding
    Sports
    Subrogation
    Tax
    Taxation
    Ticket
    Title VII
    Tort
    Tortious Interference
    Trademark
    Trademark Enforcement
    Trademark Litigation
    Trespass
    Trespass To Chattels
    TTAB
    Uniform Commercial Code
    Unpaid
    Vehicle
    Workplace Accident

    RSS Feed

    Privacy Policy
    Terms of Use
    Disclaimer


Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
Photo used under Creative Commons from Phil Roeder