Nair Law LLC
  • Home
  • Biography
    • Rishi Nair >
      • Representative Experience
      • Publications & Awards
      • Professional & Civic Activities
      • Additional Background
  • Nair Law LLC Blog
  • Press Coverage
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer

COMED SMART METERS START FIRES

8/30/2012

0 Comments

 
The Chicago Tribune reports that Commonwealth Edison in Chicago has confirmed that three of its newly installed Smart Meters have started fires in consumers' homes.  Smart Meters are electricity meters that provide both ComEd and homeowners with wireless information on electric usage patterns and allow ComEd to save on "meter maids" who read electric meters.  

Smart Meters also can interact with appliances, allow ComEd to force shutdown of appliances during peak consumption times, and carry a number of concerns ranging from privacy concerns to health concerns from the wireless signals they emit to communicate with ComEd and appliances within the consumer's home.

Read More
0 Comments

BED BUG LAWSUIT AGAINST MARRIOTT

8/27/2012

3 Comments

 
The Chicago Tribune reports that two mothers of children staying at two different Marriott hotels were bitten by bedbugs during recent stays.  The lawsuit filed recently alleges that when the guests stayed at the hotel they slept on the beds and bedding provided by the hotel and awoke to bumps and bites all over her their “arms, hands, back, legs and scalp.”  They were diagnosed as bedbug bites.

As the operator of a hotel, Marriott and its management owes their guests special duties, much like common carriers such as Amtrak.  This special duty is a relic from early Anglo-law aimed at ensuring safety for travelers. Marriott, the lawsuit alleges, breached this special duty to its guests when it failed to provide guests with sanitary rooms, failed to inspect and exterminate rooms, and failed to recognize the signs of bed bug attacks.

Read More
3 Comments

INFOSYS WINS DISMISSAL ON WHISTLEBLOWER CASE

8/24/2012

0 Comments

 
The NY Times reports that a whistleblower lawsuit was fully dismissed against Infosys.  The whistleblower is an idled Infosys employee working in the US who reported H1-B visa fraud and was subsequently denied promotions, demoted, and eventually idled.  After the internal report to his supervisors, the whistleblower plaintiff received at least five threats. 

While these facts may succeed in Illinois, the judge in Alabama found that their state law did not support a retaliation claim.  The standard in Alabama is that the retaliation must be “so severe that no reasonable person could be expected to endure it.”

Read More
0 Comments

CAT SMELL OFFENDS CONDO NEIGHBORS WHO SUE ASSOCIATION AND NEIGHBOR

8/21/2012

0 Comments

 
The Chicago Tribune has reported an amusing, but common, story of neighbors who use their respective property in incompatible ways that create conflict.  According to a lawsuit filed, likely based on nuisance, breach of contract, and violations of the Condominium Property Act, 765 ILCS 605/1 et seq., a set of owners that had a condo in the building before the new owner ("Cat Lady"), have allergies to cats.  Cat Lady has allegedly accumulated 20 cats in her single bedroom condo.  The smell from the urine and feces has wafted, through shared ventilation, into the neighboring condos.  The affected condo owners have sent letters notifying both the Cat Lady and the association (and its Board) of the issue.  Even with notice, all parties failed to cure the issue and the offended parties sued.

Read More
0 Comments

JUDGE MISREPRESENTED ITEM ON CRAIGSLIST, NOW FACING CRIMINAL CHARGES

8/21/2012

0 Comments

 
The ABA Journal reports that a Massachusetts judge faces larceny charges after she misrepresented an item listed and sold through the popular online classifieds craigslist.com.  The judge told the buyer that her item, a kids playset, was in good working order and a complete set. The buyer discovered afterwards that those claims were false.  When the buyer attempted to return the set, the judge claimed she was not a store and would not accept the set back and that the item was being sold "as is."

Read More
0 Comments

STOPPING DEBT COLLECTION MALFEASANCE

8/20/2012

0 Comments

 
Debt collectors are getting even more aggressive in the wake of the Great Financial Collapse of 2008.  As more and more Americans lose their jobs, homes, and livelihoods, debt collectors have expanded their "playbook" to collect on the debts created by the moribund economic state.

The Chicago Tribune has posted an article describing the aggressive, and often illegal, tactics that debt collectors have employed since 2008.  Some states, such as California, are pushing back through lawsuits, both public and private, as well as proposed new state laws to counter some of the more egregious tactics, including harassing phone calls, intimidation, and a flood of lawsuits where they mostly obtain judgments by default and seek to enforce their judgments by freezing assets or garnishing wages (if any).

Read More
0 Comments

2ND DIST. RULING POSES RISK FOR CONDO ASSOCIATIONS

8/19/2012

0 Comments

 
The Chicago Tribune has an article about a Second District Appellate ruling, Spanish Court Two Condominium Association v. Lisa Carlson, that has remarkably altered the status quo in condominium law regarding a condo association's right, under the Forcible Entry and Detainer Act,  to seize an owner's condo for failure to pay association assessments until, through rental of the property, the assessment arrears are satisfied.   2012 Ill. App. LEXIS 544, *7-8 (Ill. App. Ct. 2d Dist. 2012); 735 ILCS 5/9-111 (West 2010).  

The novel issue in the case revolved around whether the owner can countersue and claim as an affirmative defense that the association's "failure to maintain the common elements of the property as required in the condominium instrument."  Id. at *8.

Read More
0 Comments

CONSUMER BREACH OF WARRANTY LAWSUITS

8/17/2012

0 Comments

 
Everyday products injure consumers in ways that could and could not have been foreseen. All of the various products we encounter in daily life usually have some kind of a warranty, either express or implied, in their use and operation. Most people are familiar with warranties when an object breaks or injures someone.

Read More
0 Comments

STUDENT AWARDED $4.5M IN DISTRESS LAWSUIT

8/17/2012

0 Comments

 
A jury awarded a University of Michigan student $4.5 million based on the actions of a former Michigan assistant attorney general who wrote negatively about the student on his personal blog.

You know the old saying, an attorney who represents himself has a fool for a client.  Well, the foolish former assistant attorney general represented himself and stubbornly went down with his own ship.  Relying entirely on a First Amendment defense, he refused to accept a settlement offer to apologize and retract his comments that the student used alcohol to entire minors to have sex with him.

Read More
0 Comments

UNITED WORKER FIRED AFTER COMPLAINT TO BOSS

8/17/2012

0 Comments

 
Employment litigation can often enter the news when it involves salacious or outrageous details, but newsworthy or not, not every employment dispute can be resolved through litigation.  Retaliatory discharge (or demotion) claims can often be messy, but employers are not allowed under Federal and Illinois law to retaliate against employees for protected conduct.  Employers can insulate themselves from liability by developing procedures and documentation.  We can discuss with any size company measures that protect everyone from potential harm.

The anti-retaliation provision of Title VII of The Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII") prohibits an employer from "discriminat[ing] against any of his employees . . . because he has made a charge" under Title VII.  42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a).  Title VII allows "a person claiming to be aggrieved" to file a charge with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the "EEOC") alleging that the employer committed an unlawful employment practice, and, if the EEOC declines to sue the employer, the statute permits a civil lawsuit to "be brought . . . by the person claiming to be aggrieved . . . by the alleged unlawful employment practice."  42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5 (b), (f)(1).

Read More
0 Comments
<<Previous

    Author

    Rishi Nair owns Nair Law LLC and practices as Of Counsel at Keener and Associates, P.C.

    Archives

    October 2013
    September 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012

    Categories

    All
    Accident
    ADA
    Affirmative Defense
    Alienation Of Affection
    Appeal
    Association
    Award
    Bankruptcy
    Breach Of Contract
    Breach Of Warranty
    Cancellation
    Cease And Desist
    Certify
    Choice Of Forum
    Choice Of Law
    Civil Rights
    Civil Rights Act Of 1964
    Class
    Class Action
    Commerce Clause
    Common Carrier
    Common Elements
    Compliance
    Condo
    Condominium
    Constitution
    Constitutional Rights
    Contracts
    Conversion
    Countersue
    Criminal Defense
    Debt
    Debt Collector
    Deep Dish Pizza
    Defamation
    Defense
    Dilution
    Disability
    Discrimination
    Dog Bite
    Driver
    Duty Of Care
    Elements
    Employment
    Employment Litigation
    Expert
    Express Warranty
    Failure To Maintain
    Fall Protection
    FDCPA
    Federal
    Federal Law
    First Amendment
    FOIA
    Forcible Entry And Detainer Act
    Forum Non Conveniens
    Fourteenth Amendment
    Hotel
    Illinois
    Illinois Law
    Implied Warranty
    Infringement
    Injunction
    Insurance
    Intellectual Property
    Intentional Tort
    IP Litigation
    IP Litigation
    Jury
    Jury Verdict
    Lawsuit
    Litigation
    Medical Malpractice
    Negligence
    Negotiate
    Osha
    Personal Injury
    Product Liability
    Property
    Protected Conduct
    Real Estate Landlord Tenant Ordinance
    Real Property
    Reckless
    Retaliation
    RLTO
    Safety
    Second Appellate District
    Section 1983
    Seniority
    Settlement
    Seventh Circuit
    Special
    Speeding
    Sports
    Subrogation
    Tax
    Taxation
    Ticket
    Title VII
    Tort
    Tortious Interference
    Trademark
    Trademark Enforcement
    Trademark Litigation
    Trespass
    Trespass To Chattels
    TTAB
    Uniform Commercial Code
    Unpaid
    Vehicle
    Workplace Accident

    RSS Feed

    Privacy Policy
    Terms of Use
    Disclaimer


Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
Photo used under Creative Commons from Phil Roeder