Nair Law LLC
  • Home
  • Biography
    • Rishi Nair >
      • Representative Experience
      • Publications & Awards
      • Professional & Civic Activities
      • Additional Background
  • Nair Law LLC Blog
  • Press Coverage
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer

Pella Windows Settles Class Action Regarding Product Defect Case

1/29/2013

0 Comments

 
The Chicago Tribune reports that Pella Corp., of Iowa, manufacturer of self-branded windows, has reached a settlement with a Lake Forest doctor who sued Pella over issues with his ProLine series of windows in his home.  The doctor brought a class action against Pella Corp. in the name of all owners of ProLine series windows and Pella has agreed to pay those owners between $750 and $6,000 as well as warranty against wood rot.
After purchasing ProLine casement windows from Pella and having them installed in his home, the Plaintiff began to notice that the wood frame for the windows was rotting.  Unfortunately, the windows were no longer warrantied and, presumably, Pella refused to repair or replace them for that reason.  Thus, in 2006, Saltzman filed a lawsuit alleging that the windows had a design defect that permits water to seep behind the aluminum cladding and cause wood rot.  Pella, naturally, denied that there was any design defect in the window and maintained that wood rot could occur for many reasons and did not indicate a design defect.

So Pella's attorneys thought their best route was to say that their windows just naturally disintegrated and rotted and that was what consumers should expect?  Somehow knocking your own product is being viewed as a good defense.

Product liability litigation often hinges on expert testimony on the design or performance of products.  In this case, Pella is stocked with engineers and other experts that are ready to testify and demonstrate how their product performs to the level consumers expect and they would likely have many explanations for the particular wood rot issues facing owners.  Home construction involves many variables, most importantly the home itself as well as the builder's competence.  While Pella may have been able to mount a defense in that capacity, the presence of this article in a major newspaper is not attractive to a Midwestern company that markets its products as superior to the competition at keeping the elements out of the home while maintaining a stylish look.  

Sometimes attorneys need to realize that the best advice for their client may be something that they do not want to hear, but need to be aware of before deciding to keep a fight going that ultimately hurts business interests.  Nair Law LLC handles both sides of this dilemma.  We represent businesses and defend against product liability claims but we also represent consumers harmed by shoddy products entering a robust marketplace and deceptive claims by manufacturers trying to get a leg up on their competition.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Rishi Nair owns Nair Law LLC and practices as Of Counsel at Keener and Associates, P.C.

    Archives

    October 2013
    September 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012

    Categories

    All
    Accident
    ADA
    Affirmative Defense
    Alienation Of Affection
    Appeal
    Association
    Award
    Bankruptcy
    Breach Of Contract
    Breach Of Warranty
    Cancellation
    Cease And Desist
    Certify
    Choice Of Forum
    Choice Of Law
    Civil Rights
    Civil Rights Act Of 1964
    Class
    Class Action
    Commerce Clause
    Common Carrier
    Common Elements
    Compliance
    Condo
    Condominium
    Constitution
    Constitutional Rights
    Contracts
    Conversion
    Countersue
    Criminal Defense
    Debt
    Debt Collector
    Deep Dish Pizza
    Defamation
    Defense
    Dilution
    Disability
    Discrimination
    Dog Bite
    Driver
    Duty Of Care
    Elements
    Employment
    Employment Litigation
    Expert
    Express Warranty
    Failure To Maintain
    Fall Protection
    FDCPA
    Federal
    Federal Law
    First Amendment
    FOIA
    Forcible Entry And Detainer Act
    Forum Non Conveniens
    Fourteenth Amendment
    Hotel
    Illinois
    Illinois Law
    Implied Warranty
    Infringement
    Injunction
    Insurance
    Intellectual Property
    Intentional Tort
    IP Litigation
    IP Litigation
    Jury
    Jury Verdict
    Lawsuit
    Litigation
    Medical Malpractice
    Negligence
    Negotiate
    Osha
    Personal Injury
    Product Liability
    Property
    Protected Conduct
    Real Estate Landlord Tenant Ordinance
    Real Property
    Reckless
    Retaliation
    RLTO
    Safety
    Second Appellate District
    Section 1983
    Seniority
    Settlement
    Seventh Circuit
    Special
    Speeding
    Sports
    Subrogation
    Tax
    Taxation
    Ticket
    Title VII
    Tort
    Tortious Interference
    Trademark
    Trademark Enforcement
    Trademark Litigation
    Trespass
    Trespass To Chattels
    TTAB
    Uniform Commercial Code
    Unpaid
    Vehicle
    Workplace Accident

    RSS Feed

    Privacy Policy
    Terms of Use
    Disclaimer


Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
Photo used under Creative Commons from Phil Roeder