Nair Law LLC
  • Home
  • Biography
    • Rishi Nair >
      • Representative Experience
      • Publications & Awards
      • Professional & Civic Activities
      • Additional Background
  • Nair Law LLC Blog
  • Press Coverage
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer

CHICAGO TEACHERS UNION STRIKE MAY BE ILLEGAL

9/12/2012

0 Comments

 
The Chicago Teachers Union is striking in Chicago right now.  The teacher's union hurdled the many procedural requirements to legally strike for wages, but recent changes to the Illinois Educational Labor Relations Act, 115 ILCS 5/1 (IELRA) may have made the strike illegal as wage demands have been met.  Below is an unofficial napkin analysis of the legal issues at play.  Since some provisions have only been effective for a bit over a year, there is no real precedent on this issue and this napkin analysis reviews the plain statutory law that governs this strike.
For an additional reference, here is the CPS's graphic overview of the bargaining process that precedes and authorizes strike votes (or notices).  Strikes are governed by Section 13 of the IELRA.  115 ILCS 5/13.  Section 13 lists the various procedural steps necessary for a legal strike.

Section 4 of the Act describes what issues the employer must discuss and what issues are prohibited from being strike worthy. Section 4 concludes that "Employers, however shall be required to bargain collectively with regard to policy matters directly affecting wages, hours and terms and conditions of employment as well as the impact thereon upon request by employee representatives."  115 ILCS 5/4.

Thus, Section 4 of the Act mandates collective bargaining on wages, hours and terms and conditions of employment.  The employer can refuse to discuss other issues and the Union may not strike over them.  See 115 ILCS 5/4 ("Employers shall not be required to bargain over matters of inherent managerial policy, which shall include such areas of discretion or policy as the functions of the employer, standards of services, its overall budget, the organizational structure and selection of new employees and direction of employees").

Section 4.5 governs what the CTU (or any collective bargaining unit in IL) may strike for and what issues the employer (CPS) may unilaterally prevent a strike on.  115 ILCS 5/4.5.

Together, with the news that the issues remain on ancillary points like school closures, principal rehiring powers, teacher evaluations, and not on wages or terms  and conditions of employment, the strike seems vulnerable to an action by CPS in Cook County Circuit Courts (Chancery Division) for injunctive relief against the strike.  While Union attorneys can point to disagreements on the length of the school day or, perhaps, their desire for a larger than 16% raise in the face of national economic turmoil, it is likely their earlier concessions that compensation was no longer an issue will be used to impeach such assertions.  The fact that they admitted to being close on salary indicates to me that the issue was no longer in contention.  The Union's repeated assertions that teacher evaluations and the recall of laid off teachers were key sticking points also buttress the fact that issues that cannot enable a strike are driving the strike.

Alternatively, there exists another legal ground to nullify the strike. With the tidal wave of violence across the city, CPS could also sue for an injunction based on the clear and present danger the strike poses to the health and safety of the city's public at large, but especially children in rougher neighborhoods with huge spikes in violence like the Grand Crossing and Ogden neighborhoods.  115 ILCS 5/13(b).  

As the Act states "the employer may initiate in the circuit court of the county in which such danger exists an action for relief which may include, but is not limited to, injunction. The court may grant appropriate relief upon the finding that such clear and present danger exists."  115 ILCS 5/13(b).  Not only could the CPS threaten injunctive relief, they could assert other damages, if any are present.

It seems that Mayor Emanuel wishes to resolve this dispute outside of litigation, but if this fiasco drags on, it would not surprise me to see CPS and Corporate Counsel attorneys collaborating on a lawsuit aiming to shut down the strike in one of these two ways. 
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Rishi Nair owns Nair Law LLC and practices as Of Counsel at Keener and Associates, P.C.

    Archives

    October 2013
    September 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012

    Categories

    All
    Accident
    ADA
    Affirmative Defense
    Alienation Of Affection
    Appeal
    Association
    Award
    Bankruptcy
    Breach Of Contract
    Breach Of Warranty
    Cancellation
    Cease And Desist
    Certify
    Choice Of Forum
    Choice Of Law
    Civil Rights
    Civil Rights Act Of 1964
    Class
    Class Action
    Commerce Clause
    Common Carrier
    Common Elements
    Compliance
    Condo
    Condominium
    Constitution
    Constitutional Rights
    Contracts
    Conversion
    Countersue
    Criminal Defense
    Debt
    Debt Collector
    Deep Dish Pizza
    Defamation
    Defense
    Dilution
    Disability
    Discrimination
    Dog Bite
    Driver
    Duty Of Care
    Elements
    Employment
    Employment Litigation
    Expert
    Express Warranty
    Failure To Maintain
    Fall Protection
    FDCPA
    Federal
    Federal Law
    First Amendment
    FOIA
    Forcible Entry And Detainer Act
    Forum Non Conveniens
    Fourteenth Amendment
    Hotel
    Illinois
    Illinois Law
    Implied Warranty
    Infringement
    Injunction
    Insurance
    Intellectual Property
    Intentional Tort
    IP Litigation
    IP Litigation
    Jury
    Jury Verdict
    Lawsuit
    Litigation
    Medical Malpractice
    Negligence
    Negotiate
    Osha
    Personal Injury
    Product Liability
    Property
    Protected Conduct
    Real Estate Landlord Tenant Ordinance
    Real Property
    Reckless
    Retaliation
    RLTO
    Safety
    Second Appellate District
    Section 1983
    Seniority
    Settlement
    Seventh Circuit
    Special
    Speeding
    Sports
    Subrogation
    Tax
    Taxation
    Ticket
    Title VII
    Tort
    Tortious Interference
    Trademark
    Trademark Enforcement
    Trademark Litigation
    Trespass
    Trespass To Chattels
    TTAB
    Uniform Commercial Code
    Unpaid
    Vehicle
    Workplace Accident

    RSS Feed

    Privacy Policy
    Terms of Use
    Disclaimer


Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
Photo used under Creative Commons from Phil Roeder