Nair Law LLC
  • Home
  • Biography
    • Rishi Nair >
      • Representative Experience
      • Publications & Awards
      • Professional & Civic Activities
      • Additional Background
  • Nair Law LLC Blog
  • Press Coverage
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer

Cain v. Hamer, New IL Tax Decision, Benefits Snowbirds

4/8/2013

1 Comment

 
It is not uncommon for property owners in Chicago or its suburbs to own a condo or single family home and then, when they have the means, purchase a winter home where they flee during the winter.  While global warming has created some very mild winters in Chicago recently, this trend is not changing.

A recent Illinois tax decision should further incentivize property owners in Illinois to hold onto their Illinois properties and avoid Illinois taxation.
The First Appellate District heard an appeal from the Illinois Department of Revenue.  The Department felt that property owners in Illinois, who had, for all intents and purposes, moved to living more than half of the year in Florida, were still liable for Illinois taxes because they had not renounced their Illinois residency.  The Circuit Court, however, granted summary judgment for the property owners and, in Cain v. Hamer, the First District agreed with the Circuit Court and affirmed its ruling that the relevant factors supported the conclusion that plaintiffs had abandoned Illinois and were Florida residents for purposes of the Illinois Income Tax Act during the tax years at issue.

The relevant facts are as follows.  In August 2006, the Department sent the plaintiffs a notice of tax deficiency, which asserted that the plaintiffs owed $1,842,582 in unpaid income taxes and penalties for the years from 1996 through 2004.  Despite facing a nearly $2M tax liability, the Plaintiff's cooly submitted payment under protest and thereafter filed a complaint seeking a declaration that they were not Illinois residents during the disputed period.  The parties stipulated to facts for the purposes of cross-motions for summary judgment.  The stipulation noted that the couple renounced their Illinois residency in 1995, obtained Florida identification cards in 1996 and participated in various civil processes, including jury duty, in Florida.  The Appellate Court also morbidly found significance in the fact they both purchased burial plots in Florida.

Countering the Florida connection, Mrs. Cain, an interior designer, continually renewed her Illinois interior design license and repeatedly failed to note her address had changed to Florida from Illinois.  They both retained memberships in various clubs in both states.

The spent their time about evenly between Florida and Illinois but their intent, as evidenced by the facts above, was to be a domicile and resident of Florida.

Weighing the factors, the Circuit Court ruled that the Cains were "mere seasonal visitors" and therefore they were not subject to the taxes at issue.

The Appellate Court, careful to frame the issues, wisely focused on the statute at issue:  "Section 201(a) of the Illinois Income Tax Act (Act) (35 ILCS 5/201(a) (West 2010)) imposes an income tax 'on the privilege of earning or receiving income in or as a resident of this State.'"  Resident, as the Court notes, is not the same term of art as used in voting or other statutes.  Rather, Section 1501(a)(20)(A) of the Act, defines the word “resident” as “an individual (i) who is in this State for other than a temporary or transitory  purpose during the taxable year; or (ii) who is domiciled in this State but is absent from the  State for a temporary or transitory purpose during the taxable year.” 35 ILCS 5/1501(a)(20)(A) (West 2010).

In case you jumped out of your seat at this rather banal statutory definition, plant yourself firmly back down because temporary or part-time resident is defined as an individual who became a resident during the taxable year or ceased to be a resident during the taxable year.  35 ILCS 5/1501(a)(17)(A) (West 2010).

Under Section 1501(a)(20)(A)(ii) residence commences with the establishment of domicile in this State and ceases with the establishment of domicile in another State. 35 ILCS 5/1501(a)(17) (West 2010).

While there is no statutory definition of domicile, the Department itself defines domicile similarly to caselaw.  See Viking Dodge Inc. v. Hoffman, 147 Ill. App. 3d 203, 205, 497 N.E.2d 1346 (1986) (“The four elements required for a change of domicile are physical abandonment of the first domicile; an intent not to return to the first domicile; physical presence in the new domicile; and an intent to make that one’s domicile.”).

After marching through each of the four factors outlined, the Cains were held to have effected a proper change of domicile and therefore changed their residency for tax purposes to Florida, thereby avoiding these Illinois taxes.

The consequence for Illinois residents who hold property outside of the state and are facing double taxation is clear.  Consult with an attorney like Nair Law LLC to determine how you can apply this new caselaw to save your family from double taxation.  
1 Comment
interior designers link
6/26/2014 08:58:30 pm

nice posts..............

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Rishi Nair owns Nair Law LLC and practices as Of Counsel at Keener and Associates, P.C.

    Archives

    October 2013
    September 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012

    Categories

    All
    Accident
    ADA
    Affirmative Defense
    Alienation Of Affection
    Appeal
    Association
    Award
    Bankruptcy
    Breach Of Contract
    Breach Of Warranty
    Cancellation
    Cease And Desist
    Certify
    Choice Of Forum
    Choice Of Law
    Civil Rights
    Civil Rights Act Of 1964
    Class
    Class Action
    Commerce Clause
    Common Carrier
    Common Elements
    Compliance
    Condo
    Condominium
    Constitution
    Constitutional Rights
    Contracts
    Conversion
    Countersue
    Criminal Defense
    Debt
    Debt Collector
    Deep Dish Pizza
    Defamation
    Defense
    Dilution
    Disability
    Discrimination
    Dog Bite
    Driver
    Duty Of Care
    Elements
    Employment
    Employment Litigation
    Expert
    Express Warranty
    Failure To Maintain
    Fall Protection
    FDCPA
    Federal
    Federal Law
    First Amendment
    FOIA
    Forcible Entry And Detainer Act
    Forum Non Conveniens
    Fourteenth Amendment
    Hotel
    Illinois
    Illinois Law
    Implied Warranty
    Infringement
    Injunction
    Insurance
    Intellectual Property
    Intentional Tort
    IP Litigation
    IP Litigation
    Jury
    Jury Verdict
    Lawsuit
    Litigation
    Medical Malpractice
    Negligence
    Negotiate
    Osha
    Personal Injury
    Product Liability
    Property
    Protected Conduct
    Real Estate Landlord Tenant Ordinance
    Real Property
    Reckless
    Retaliation
    RLTO
    Safety
    Second Appellate District
    Section 1983
    Seniority
    Settlement
    Seventh Circuit
    Special
    Speeding
    Sports
    Subrogation
    Tax
    Taxation
    Ticket
    Title VII
    Tort
    Tortious Interference
    Trademark
    Trademark Enforcement
    Trademark Litigation
    Trespass
    Trespass To Chattels
    TTAB
    Uniform Commercial Code
    Unpaid
    Vehicle
    Workplace Accident

    RSS Feed

    Privacy Policy
    Terms of Use
    Disclaimer


Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
Photo used under Creative Commons from Phil Roeder